Zero
Cleanroom engineering review
Compliance failures across two regulatory inspections, after 23 compliance risks were resolved.
Read the case study
Onshore & offshore
Ageing assets force hard choices. Without condition and cost data, capital goes to whichever asset failed most recently, and the next crisis is already building somewhere else. We help operators plan the life of their assets using condition, risk and cost evidence, and keep them compliant along the way. Capital goes where it reduces the most risk, and nothing gets missed at audit.
Lifecycle decisions need a reliable register and condition baseline. We build or verify both from your existing records, and engineers confirm them on site.
Running an asset to the end of its life by accident is the most expensive way to do it. We set out repair, refurbish, life-extend or replace options for each major asset, with costs and timing, so spend can be planned years ahead.
Not every old asset is a problem. We rank assets by condition, criticality and consequence, so capital and attention go to the ones carrying real risk.
Statutory inspections and written schemes slip when nobody owns them. We check that every regulated asset has the right inspection regime, that it is being done and that the records will stand up to a regulator.
Zero
Compliance failures across two regulatory inspections, after 23 compliance risks were resolved.
Read the case studyDeciding in advance when each major asset will be maintained, refurbished or replaced, based on its condition, risk and cost.
No. We focus on the practical engineering decisions behind asset management.
Tell us what you run and what keeps going wrong. We'll tell you straight how we'd approach it.
Start the conversation