USD 2.5M
Offshore stimulation reliability
Campaign savings for an offshore operator on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, by moving frac pumps from routine inspection to a controlled run-to-limit.
Read the case studySpend maintenance effort where failure would cost most.
Fixed maintenance plans treat a standby pump the same as the pump that feeds the whole process. That wastes hours on low-risk assets and leaves high-risk ones under-protected. We help operators set maintenance effort by the risk of failure, combining likelihood with consequence. Effort shifts to where it protects people and production, and spend on low-risk assets comes down.
Risk is likelihood times consequence, and most sites only know one of the two. We take consequence from the criticality assessment and likelihood from failure history, condition data and asset age, then plot every asset on one risk matrix.
High-risk assets get condition monitoring, tighter inspection or redesign. Low-risk assets move to longer intervals or run to failure. Each change is documented with its risk reasoning, so it can be defended to auditors and insurers.
Gut feel overstates the risk of some assets and misses others entirely. Where failure data exists we use it, including free-text work order history, to find failures that were never coded properly. Where it doesn't, OREDA industry data gives a realistic starting likelihood.
Risk changes as assets age and plant changes. We set up a review cycle so the strategy keeps up.
Many plants have never recorded enough failures to give a realistic likelihood of failure. Where your own history is thin, we use OREDA, the energy industry's reliability database built from over four decades of offshore and onshore equipment records, to set realistic failure rates. As your own data builds, it takes over.
About OREDAUSD 2.5M
Campaign savings for an offshore operator on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, by moving frac pumps from routine inspection to a controlled run-to-limit.
Read the case studyA way of setting maintenance effort by the likelihood and consequence of failure, rather than applying the same plan to every asset.
RBI (risk-based inspection) applies the same thinking to static equipment like vessels and pipework. RBM covers maintenance more broadly.
No. Consequence is assessed from the plant design, and likelihood can start from OREDA industry reliability data and improve as your own history builds.
Tell us what you run and what keeps going wrong. We'll tell you straight how we'd approach it.
Start the conversation